Food for thought - articles & viewpoints
- Featured articles
Articles & viewpoints
FEATURED ARTICLES
Click on the links to go to articles
- Innovation and inclusiveness priorities as Tasmanians eye future. (Rikki Mawad, Mercury 23 October 2021)
- Future desired character in images, Blackmans Bay - Kingston area and environs. (Blackmans Bay Community Association, July 2021)
- A natural answer to happier kids. Leanne McLean - Tasmania's Commissioner for Children and Young People (CCYP) (Mercury Talking Point, 3 July 2021). The Commissioner's full report on the results of wellbeing consultations with 0 to 18 year old Tasmanians is available on the CCYP website here: 'We call it happy...'
- Science for sustainability: The paradigm shift our world needs. Glenys Jones (MAHB June 3, 2021)
- Beware of Building Future Slums. Anne Harrison (Mercury, March 2021)
- The end of the city? No, not quite. Sarah Barns, Inside Story (16 September 2020)
- Not too late to change. Simon Bevilacqua (Mercury, 2 February 2019)
- Be brave, protect us and our brand. Ian Johnston (Mercury, 26 January 2019)
In Tasmania:
- Clearfell logging simply does not fit with Tasmania's best interests (Fiona Weave, Mercury 16 October 2021)
- A natural answer to happier kids. Leanne McLean - Tasmania's Commissioner for Children and Young People (Mercury Talking Point, 3 July 2021)
- Show your hand on projects law. Peter McGlone (Mercury, 18 August 2020)
- Residents had their say and Rosny Hill was approved anyway. Beth Rees (Mercury, 30 January 2020)
- Wilkie takes parks fight to Canberra. David Killick (Mercury, 5 December 2019)
- Keep grand vista for community. Glebe residents have fought for decades to protect Domain House site and want it to be polished, not destroyed. Roland Browne (Mercury, 25 Oct 2019)
- Ratepayers demand a low-rise city. Brian Corr (Mercury, 17 August 2019)
- Tasmania doesn't need highrise. Merlene Abbott (The Kingston Classifieds No. 1092, 25 July 2019)
- Performance based planning: can it achieve sustainable outcomes in Tasmania? Jess Feehely (EDO Tasmania, RMPAT Bulletin, Jan 2010). See also Anything goes? Performance-based planning and the slippery slope in Queensland planning law by Philippa England and Amy McInerney (2017) 34 EPLJ
- Overview of the Natural Assets Code prepared for TasPIN by Indra Boss (Researcher, University of Tasmania). See also the government's Fact Sheet No. 8 on the Natural Assets Code prepared by the Department of Justice.
- Paupers in Tassie's vanishing paradise. Brade Stansfield (Mercury, 23 February 2019)
- Not too late to change. Simon Bevilacqua (Mercury, 2 February 2019)
- Be brave, protect us and our brand. Ian Johnston (Mercury, 26 January 2019)
- Ensuring a prosperous future needs a lot of careful planning. Indra Boss and Anne Harrison (Mercury, 2 Oct 2018)
- Where's the Government? Mercury editorial, 23 Aug 2018
- It's like Disneyland in Tasmania. Martin Flanagan opposes the proposal to build a Chinese-funded town near Swansea. ('Ideas over a cuppa' with Amanda Ducker, Mercury 23 August 2018)
- Home sweet home. It's time to decide what we want our capital city to look and feel like, explains Stephen Poljansek. Mercury 30 July 2018
- Losing our home. Our remote island refuge from a world gone mad is threatened today as it was in 1803, but this time it's chequebooks doing the persuading, not guns and gallows. Sophie Underwood and Greg Lehman (Mercury, 28 July 2018)
- Bring it on: the population inquiry our elites do not want. Judith Sloan, The Australian, 17 July 2018
- Cold, wet, taxed and happy as hell. Leena Lavonius, Mercury 26 March 2018
- State's housing crisis demands radical change from old approach. Greg Barns, Mercury 26 March 2018
- Tasmanian Housing Summit Directions Paper. Institute for the Study of Social Change, University of Tasmania, March 2018. "This directions paper has been prepared as a resource to inform the deliberations of the Tasmanian Housing Summit to be held on 15 March 2018. The analysis draws on the University of Tasmania’s expertise in housing policy and builds on the Institute for the Study of Social Change’s recently released Blueprint for Improving Housing Outcomes in Tasmania."
- Growth pains and gridlock come to Hobart, and building more roads is not the best way out. Emma Pharo and Jason Byrne. The Conversation, 1 March 2018
- Planning, Heritage and the Tasmanian Election. Gwenda Sheridan, Tasmanian Times 1 March 2018
- Red tape gives way to power grab. 'Over-regulation needed fixing, but planning changes are dangerous' says Greg Barns, Mercury 5 February 2018
- Still pain in the boom times PLUS Ease of living a top drawcard. Alexandra Humphries and Loretta Lohberger, Mercury 13 January 2018
- Only a clear vision can protect what makes Tasmania great. Sophie Underwood (Planning Matters Alliance), Mercury 2 January 2018
- Time to sit down and talk. 'You have this crazy scenario where the Government is pushing forward with a conflict-ridden agenda that neither side wants.' David Killick, Mercury 2 January 2018
- Investors and tourists lining up for more. Elise Archer (Minister for Environment and Parks), Mercury 2 January 2018
- Let's develop to preserve best PLUS What the readers said. Simeon Thomas-Wilson, Mercury 2 January 2018
- Council Act a smart idea. Mercury editorial, 8 December 2017
- Growth good but get it right. Mercury editorial, 28 November 2017
- Charles Wooley article: Barcelona locals have seen their city overrun by tourists (Mercury, 25 November 2017)
- Planning law changes deliver reduced rights for the public (Anne Harrison - TasPIN, Mercury 28 October 2017)
- Don't settle for mediocre. Mercury editorial, 26 October 2017
- Governments don't need more power over developments (Peter McGlone - Director, Tasmanian Conservation Trust, Mercury 28 September 2017)
- Clever thinking for a livable city (Ron Christie - Hobart Deputy Lord Mayor, Mercury 2 September 2017)
- With planning, sky's the limit. Citizens must get involved in policy not just react to projects. (Dion Lester, Mercury 18 August 2017)
- Big time for cable car. Mercury editorial, 16 August 2017
- Build on our city's beauty (Simon Bevilacqua, Mercury 12 August 2017)
- Planning rules try to stop us making the same mistakes twice. (Garry Forward, Mercury, 25 July 2017)
- Community has spoken. Any developers are well advised to work in partnership with the countries and states in which they invest. Mercury editorial, 25 July 2017
- Plenty of chances for people to have a say in our city's future (Jeff Biscoe - Chair Hobart city council's Planning Committee, Mercury 21 July 2017)
- Path right for cable car. Mercury editorial, 17 July 2017
- A coherent plan must underpin any city deal. (Craig Perkins, Mercury, 12 July 2017)
- Planning for the people. Mercury editorial, 5 July 2017
- Don't let this chance pass. Mercury editorial 3 July 2017
- City future decision time. Mercury editorial, 28 June 2017
- Stop the assault on our city's soul (Roland Browne, Mercury 21 June 2017)
- Care for places dear to our hearts (Jamie Kirkpatrick, Mercury 19 June 2017)
- Compromise a big risk in high-rise debate (Andrew Edwards, Mercury 16 June 2017)
- Develop for a better city. Mercury editorial, 31 May 2017
- Vision needs consultation. Mercury editorial, 27 May 2017
- Planning laws favour development (Sophie Underwood, Mercury 22 May 2017)
- Scaling the heights of uncertainty. Planning schemes are needed to protect cities against outrageous development. (Jamieson Allom, The Mercury 19 May 2017)
- Hobart at the cross roads in tourism debate. Kerry Johnstone says Tasmania's capital must learn lessons from other small cities. (The Mercury, 18 May 2017)
- Hobart CBD's unique character under attack by developers (David Halse-Rogers, Mercury 15 may 2017)
- It'll tower over our brand power (Gerard Castles, The Mercury 11 May 2017)
- New state planning laws a disruptive attack on communities. (Linley Grant, Mercury 8 May 2017)
- It's about who we want to be. Richard Flanagan says transplanting Singapore skyscrapers into Hobart will ruin the nature of our Tasmanian capital. (The Mercury 6 May 2017)
- Heritage rift deepens. (Simeon Thomas-Wilson, The Mercury 19 April 2017)
- We need an inclusive style of government (Dr Rosemary Sandford, The Mercury 17 March 2017)
- Developers ride roughshod over our heritage - Dodgy demolitions tear at the fabric of our cities (Rosemary Sandford, The Mercury 3 March 2017)
- Stay true to Hobart - New hotels must fit in, says boss of award-winning Woolstore (Jennifer Crawley, The Mercury 2 March 2017)
- Talking Point: We need a healthier perspective on urban planning schemes (Graeme Lynch, The Mercury 4 February 2017)
- Below is an extract from the article titled 'Our future' by David Walsh (The Mercury, 10 Dec 2016).
"The future is tough. Conflicts happen, fashions change, technologies appear, boundaries are re-drawn, permissions are withdrawn, waters rise and nations fall. And people change their minds. That's just the easy stuff. The hard stuff is the stuff that happens that has never happened before. So, what's the point of planning? We plan to give coherence to a world riven by chaos. A good plan is a vision, a way of seeking and a source of inspiration when we lose our way. We should not follow a plan blindly, but neither should we transgress it without purpose. Because we can't predict the future we must create it."
- Interview with Michael Buxton (Professor of Environment and Planning, RMIT) - courtesy of Friends of the East Coast Inc (25 Nov 2016)
- New planning puts wilderness edge in danger (Lawyer Greg Barnes, The Mercury 21 November 2016)
- Our greatest asset is who we are (Reg A. Watson, Talking Point article, The Mercury November 2016)
- Planning rules must reflect the community (Katrena Stephenson, Chief Executive of Local Government Association of Tasmania, The Mercury, 17 November 2016)
- Building a sustainable future (Mercury report, 14 November 2016)
- Good planning can take sting out of projects (Emma Pharo, The Mercury 7 Nov. 2016). "Key to better outcomes is to properly involve community".
- The need for one big plan (Mercury Editorial, 7 November 2016). "Hobart needs a clear and overarching strategy that brings together all the different elements of the puzzle and engages everyone."
- We need to get this right (Mercury Editorial, 2 November 2016)
- Planning now centre stage (Mercury Editorial, 31 October 2016). "The future of our planning system could well be one of the defining issues for Tasmania over the next 12 months."
- Reform raises fears for way of life (David Beniuk, The Mercury, 30 October 2016)
- Green groups alarmed by park plans (David Beniuk, The Mercury, 30 October 2016)
- Defined by pride of place (Island Life with Hilary Burden, 29 October 2016)
- Property council backs new planning legislation (Alexandra Humphries, The Mercury, 28 October 2016). Property Council Tasmania executive director Brian Wightman supports "improvements" to planning legislation which will "strengthen confidence in Tasmania's development sector". For a deeper insight, see the article Who really runs Tasmania?
- Where is the Public Planning Vision for Tasmania? (Madeleine Ogilvie, 21 Oct 2016, tasmaniantimes.com). Madeleine Ogilvie MP is Labor Member for Denison and Shadow Minister for Local Government & Public Planning, and Open Government & Information Integrity. Ogilvie states:
"There is no discernible vision for Public Planning emanating from this government. To plan for our future we need to be thinking beyond election cycles and building a shared vision for where we are headed. Yet what we are seeing at the moment is the complete reverse of that. We must engage with all Tasmanians in a broad public consulting exercise to collectively agree the vision for our future. Then create policies and schemes based on that feedback - in that order."
- Clarence moves to protect Bellerive Bluff (Alexandra Humphries, The Mercury, 7 October 2016)
- South Hobart residents very unhappy with plan for ex-Blundstone site (Rosemary Sandford, The Mercury, 15 August 2016). "This planned development fails every public benefit test"
- South Hobart residents up in arms over old Blundstone site (Rosemary Sandford, The Mercury, 22 Sept 2016)
- Who really runs Tasmania? (Graeme Wathen, Friends of the East Coast Inc, 23 June 2016). The Property Council of Australia has close links to the proposed Planning changes in Tasmania.
- Delay on planning scheme report (Alexandra Humphries, The Mercury 12 August 2016)
- Single Tasmania-wide planning scheme could overlook local character, mayor feels. ABC News, 18 May 2016
- Proposed state planning scheme seriously flawed The Mercury, 13 May 2016
- Planning Concerns The Advocate, 11 May 2016
- Planning scheme, UTAS petition, Cityprom discussed. Alexanda Humphries, The Examiner, 9 May 2016
In other states or places:
- The end of the city? No, not quite. Sarah Barns, Inside Story (16 September 2020)
- Anything goes? Performance-based planning and the slippery slope in Queensland planning law. Philippa England and Amy McInerney (2017) 34 EPLJ
- A view to cry for (Josh Fagan, Herald Sun 13 July 2019). North-facing balcony blocked by new highrise building in Melbourne devastates owners and devalues asset.
- Selling air (Conor Purcell, Open Skies [Emirates magazine] July 2019). New York's 'super tall' skyscrapers stand accused of zombie urbanism.
- Melbourne takes inspiration from Barcelona as car-free zones proposed. (Cameron Jewell, The Fifth Estate, 8 April 2018)
- How to get cohousing happening: the Newcastle story. An informative article on cohousing in other parts of Australia. (Anne Susskind, The Fifth Estate, 7 June 2018)
- Daley questions on building boom. It was a shocking week for NSW State Opposition Leader Michael Daley over his ties to developers. (Clarissa Bye, Daily Telegraph, 2 March 2019)
- How Adelaide plans to reach 'zero homelessness' within two years. (Harley Dennet, The Mandarin, 22 February 2018)
- Community activists seek review of VCAT. Local Councils in Victoria are being overridden at an alarming rate. "A decision by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) that allowed a developer in High Street, Preston in the Melbourne’s north to override a local council decision and push forward with higher and denser development has infuriated some people."
- South Australia's Better Together community engagement program: The South Australia government is actively working to involve citizens in decisions that matter to them - click on following link to Better Together. To see a video of the SA government department representative talking about the Better Together program, go to the International Association for Public Participation Australasia website at https://www.iap2.org.au/Resources/Search-Resources and check the box 'Conference Resources' then scroll down to 'VIDEO Better Together with Dan Popping...'
- Sharing responsibility and success: NZ's Better Public Service results (David Donaldson, The Mandarin, 27 March 2017)
- A tale of two juries: shaping Infrastructure Victoria's 30-year strategy (Victoria Draudins, The Mandarin, 17 March 2017)
- Contested spaces: we need to see public space through older eyes too (Desley Vine and Laurie Buys, The Conversation, 9 March 2017)
- The loudest voices (Letter to the editor, The Age, 12 Jan 2017)
- A housing plan that doesn't add up. "Of all the political weasel words beloved by our current crop of government representatives, "reform" is possibly the most insidious." (Andrew P. Street, The Age, 25 Oct 2016).
- The impact of planning ‘reform’ on the Victorian land use planning system (Buxton & Goodman, 2014) Australian Planner, 51:2, 132-140. Michael Buxton is Professor of Environment and Planning at the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University; and Robin Goodman is Deputy Dean, Sustainability and Urban Planning in RMIT's School of Global, Urban and Social Studies. The article concludes:
"There are strong connections between Victorian planning system changes and the national planning reform agenda being followed in most Australian states. Recent changes to state planning systems seek to reduce the strength of land use planning regulations, lessen the contributions of local communities, objectors and local councils to planning decisions and empower development companies. The Victorian system changes are also the result of decades of the politicisation of planning by locating responsibility for land use planning in the state planning agency under direct ministerial control, abolishing an independent state planning body, imposing deregulated standardised planning systems intended to facilitate development onto local government, and constant ministerial intervention in planning decisions. All these represent a paradigm shift in the Victorian land use planning system away from careful and considered strategy-led planning, towards market-driven ad hoc development facilitation."
- End of suburban sprawl in sight: 100,000 homes short and space running out. Sydney's land shortage - The big squeeze (Sydney Morning Herald 24 September 2016)
- Tell 'em they're dreaming An elderly Sydney woman who loves her home and garden holds out against developers' offers (Sydney Morning Herald 25-26 June 2016)
- Prosperity without growth? Professor Tim Jackson (Economics Commissioner), Sustainable Development Commission, 2009. See also Tim Jackson's TED Talk
Letters to the editor
In reverse chronological order:
- Local character at risk (Mercury, 24 January 2020)
- Ogilvie's climate Bill a welcome strategy (Mercury, 17 January 2020)
- Victory for the community. The Tasmanian Planning Commission's decision against considering the proposed Cambria Green planning scheme amendment to allow for a large-scale development at Dolphin Sands (near Swansea) is a momentous win for the community and for sound, transparent Planning decision-making (Mercury 29 November 2019)
- HOT TOPIC: SECRET PARKS DEALS comprising the following letters: Right to know shot to pieces; Our input too late: Building suspicion; Quiet ones have had it; You must be joking: Owned by us all, after all. (Mercury, 25 October 2019)
- HOT TOPIC: LAKE MALBENA DECISION comprising the following letters: Nothing like our wilderness; Noise pollution; Bugger the quiet; High end at right price; Setting a precedent; No need to explore it all (Mercury, 24 October 2019)
- Ads pure and simple (Mercury, 19 October 2019)
- Valid DA being assessed (Mercury, 27 Aug 2019)
- Master plan first (Mercury, 5 August 2019)
- Ignoring population (Mercury, 8 July 2019)
- Hey,we're stakeholders (Mercury 2 January 2019)
- Redress mistake with foreshore reserves (Mercury 3 January 2019)
- Blind to aesthetics (Mercury, 2 Oct 2018)
- Transport hub please (Mercury, 29 Sept 2018)
- Climate threats (Mercury, 29 Sept 2018)
- An enclave that doesn't protect (Mercury 23 August 2018)
- Owned by Australians (Mercury, 18 August 2018)
- Planning sham (Mercury, 30 July 2018)
- HOT TOPIC: SOUTHERN WOODCHIP MILL comprising the following letters: People power's victory sweet; Greens behind it; Fantastic news; Bleeding obvious; Back to the trenches (Mercury, 30 Jul 2018)
- Seven steps to heaven (Mercury, 28 July 2018)
- City character ruined (Mercury 28 July 2018)
- HOT TOPIC: TOURISM AND TASMANIA comprising the following letters: Wrong target in visitor battle; What next, visas?; Elephant in the room; Creative solutions; Learn from Barcelona; Focus on council job; Detrimental effects. (Mercury 26 June 2018)
- City on brink of crisis (Mercury, 23 June 2018)
- World Heritage rego (Mercury 20 June 2018)
- Better not bigger (Mercury 2 April 2018)
- Never asked (Mercury 26 March 2018)
- Save our lifestyle (Mercury 26 March 2018)
- Designed to railroad the little people? (Mercury, 27 February 2018)
- Don't do it (Mercury 27 February 2018)
- Paradise lost (Mercury 27 February 2018)
- Theme park (Mercury 27 February 2018)
- Special corner might disappear. (Mercury 17 January 2018)
- HOT TOPIC: QUALITY OF LIFE comprising the following letters: Think high-end and long-term; Lift standards; Wowsers: Number concerns; Keep us stable; Necessities (Mercury, 13 January 2018)
- HOT TOPIC: KANGAROO BAY comprising the following letters: Priceless community asset; Given away; Historical values; Charming as it is; Disregarded. (Mercury 4 December 2017)
- Potential lost (Mercury, 2 December 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: DEVELOPMENT comprising the following letters: Legacy should be wild mountain; Speaking up; Don't take the credit; Avoid Sir Joh path; Poetry in motion (Mercury 30 November 2017)
- Slower, more confusing (Mercury, 28 November 2017)
- Precious right to waterfront (Mercury 28 November 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: TOURISM comprising the following letters: Window of opportunity closing; Giving away views; Spoiling what's special; Only the best quality; Heed backlash; Pitfalls of popularity (Mercury 28 November 2017)
- Distracted by height debate (Mercury 17 November 2017)
- Bellerive issues remain (Mercury 17 November 2017)
- Planning results (Mercury 13 November 2017)
- There goes neighbourhood (Mercury 13 November 2017)
- Limit population growth (Mercury 28 October 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: PLANNING comprising the following letters: Give power back to people; Height opportunity lost; Christmas timing: Punt concern; Fast track warning. (Mercury 2 October 2017)
- Lost without red tape (Mercury 29 September 2017)
- Height message (Mercury 29 September 2017)
- Overshadowed (Mercury 28 September 2017)
- Cable car criticism (Mercury 27 September 2017)
- Keep the theme (Mercury 27 September 2017)
- Listen to Clarence residents (Mercury 25 September 2017)
- Wind farms not always progress (Mercury 25 September 2017)
- Commuters will need a place to park (Mercury 24 September 2017)
- We need rules of engagement on deal (Mercury 20 September 2017)
- Still wondering (Mercury 20 September 2017)
- McMansions (Mercury 19 September 2017)
- Keep foreshore special (Mercury 16 September 2017)
- Towering cranes (Mercury 14 September 2017)
- Low-rise the way to go (Mercury 13 September 2017)
- Take care tampering with lifestyle (Mercury 13 September 2017)
- Not wanted (Mercury 4 September 2017)
- Time to cut back on urban tree losses (Mercury 2 September 2017)
- Everyone's coastline (Mercury 2 September 2017)
- I speak for the trees (Mercury 1 September 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: HIGH-RISE DEVELOPMENT comprising the following letters: Who has final say on buildings?; Design inspiration; Tall and thin no better; Touch for developers (Mercury 31 August 2017)
- High limit sensible (Mercury 29 August 2017)
- Knock back high rise (Mercury 23 August 2017)
- All responsible (Mercury, 21 August 2017)
- Stop the tower (Mercury, 21 August 2017)
- Planning reform a minefield of drama (Mercury, 18 August 2017)
- Tied up in cable (Mercury, 18 August 2017)
- Slow on the uptake (Mercury 16 August 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: HOBART HIGH RISE comprising the following letters: Good ol' coloured brick trick; Bellerive bulldozed; Wriggle room; Double-edged sword. (Mercury, 14 August 2017)
- Heritage assets (Mercury, 12 August 2017)
- No high-rise deals (Mercury, 12 August 2017)
- Environment no voice in Government (Mercury, 11 August 2017)
- Beware (Mercury, 11 August 2017)
- Don't do it (Mercury, 11 August 2017)
- Clear vision (Mercury, 10 August 2017)
- A lovely scale (Mercury, 7 August 2017)
- A beloved place (Mercury 2 August 2017)
- Tassal is ignoring the will of the people (Mercury, 2 August 2017)
- Amenity lost (Mercury, 2 August 2017)
- Built out (Mercury 2 August 2017)
- Fight high rise (Mercury, 31 July 2017)
- A plan for Hobart's future transport needs (Mercury, 27 July 2017)
- Puzzling development (Mercury, 25 July 2017)
- Veto mountain development (Mercury, 25 July 2017)
- Just be our natural selves (Mercury, 24 July 2017)
- Aesthetics valued (Mercury, 21 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: CABLE CAR comprising the following letters: An end-run around the rules; So many blessings; Lessons not learned: Foisted on us: Keep mountain clear. (Mercury, 18 July 2017)
- Keep Hobart low rise (Mercury, 18 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT comprising the following letters: We must back our own interests; Listen to the people; Grander plan needed; Vote against towers. (Mercury, 17 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: KANGAROO BAY comprising the following letters: So many questions unanswered; Give-away prices; Development disaster; Preserve what we have. (Mercury, 15 July 2017)
- A better city. (Mercury, 12 July 2017)
- Quality is important (Mercury, 12 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: PLANNING comprising the following letters: New scheme attacks ambience; Kangaroo Bay praise; Wisdom ignored; Heritage threat. (Mercury, 11 July 2017)
- Spin cycle (Mercury 8 July 2017)
- Policies ignored (Mercury 8 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: NEW PLANNING RULES comprising the following letters: Consultation has fallen short; Growing pains; Local views ignored (Mercury, 5 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: FISH FARMS comprising the following letters: East Coast too precious to risk; Why pick on salmon? Government in denial (Mercury, 3 July 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: KANGAROO BAY comprising the following letters: Council is ignoring community; Not in my front yard; Silent majority; Kangaroo Bay (Mercury, 30 June 2017)
- Mountain is a place cherished by all (Mercury, 28 June 2017)
- Forget fish farms, there are better ideas (Mercury, 26 June 2017)
- Small is beautiful (Mercury 26 June 2017)
- Gutwein making the state bland (Mercury 24 June 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: URBAN DEVELOPMENT comprising the following letters: City's strength is unique beauty; Wrong way; Support welcome: This land is our land (Mercury, 23 June 2017)
- City's decline (Mercury, 23 June 2017)
- Fish farms need popular support (Mercury, 21 June 2017)
- Vista ruined (Mercury, 21 June 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: KANGAROO BAY comprising the following letters: Project falls far short; Do they care?; Please explain; Lesson in planning; Ridiculous. (Mercury, 19 June 2017)
- Serious threat to Battery Point precinct (Mercury, 19 June 2017)
- Appeals futile (Mercury, 16 June 2017)
- We are heading the wrong way (Mercury, 14 June 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: CITY TOWERS comprising the following 4 letters: Our city's charm lies in its scale; Unique attraction; Singapore cloned; Transient benefits. (Mercury, 14 June 2017)
- Another plan needed (Mercury, 13 June 2017)
- Not quite right (Mercury, 9 June 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: DEVELOPMENT comprising the following letters: Architects spreading ugliness; Just not safe; insipid approach
- Fight to keep Hobart's historic charm (Mercury, 5 June 2017)
- We need to protect our heritage (Mercury, 31 May 2017)
- Change of heart (Mercury, 31 May 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: PLANNING OUR CITY comprising the following 3 letters: Hobart looking cheap and ugly; Don't spoil capital; High-rise horror (Mercury, 27 May 2017)
- For a handful of jobs (Mercury, 19 May 2017)
- Who's the boss? (Mercury, 19 May 2017)
- Forestry folly (Mercury, 19 May 2017)
- Barcelona disease (Mercury, 19 May 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: PLANNING LAWS comprising the following 3 letters: Ordinary citizens disadvantaged; More consultation; Unfair fight (Mercury, 17 May 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: SKYSCRAPER PROPOSALS including the following 3 letters: Assault on Hobart's charm; Point plan; Views for all (Mercury, 15 May)
- High rises are just a load of rubbish (Mercury, 14 May 2017)
- Tasmania is different, special (Mercury, 13 May 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT comprising the following 5 letters: Take a stand for our lovely city; Mixed bag; People power; Bigger picture; Make a good mark. (Mercury, 11 May 2017)
- Rising waters (Mercury, 11 May 2017)
- Stand up for Hobart's character (Mercury, 8 May 2017)
- Bigger is not better (Mercury, 8 May 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: SKYSCRAPER DEVELOPMENTS comprising the following 4 letters: We don't need high rise towers; We have other options; Shadowy designs; Respect city's scale (Mercury, 3 May 2017)
- Growing pains (Mercury, 3 May 2017)
- Two sides to a property boom (Mercury, 2 May 2017)
- Save city's charm (Mercury, 2 May 2017)
- Just another city (Mercury, 2 May 2017)
- Planning a key issue (Mercury, 18 April 2017)
- You can't afford to fight city hall (Mercury 13 April 2017)
- Cable car enjoys favourable treatment (Mercury 4 April 2017)
- Green eyes must look at population (Mercury 2 April 2017)
- Local voices must be heard (Mercury, 2 April 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: PLANNING comprising the following 3 letters: Three facts on the new scheme; Poor decisions will go on; and What of our futures? (Mercury 1 April 2017)
- Protect Flinders Island (Mercury, 1 April 2017)
- Paradise lost in beauty spots (Mercury 1 April 2017)
- Spare our waterfront from highrise blight (Mercury 22 March 2017)
- Waterfront wrong site (Mercury 20 March 2017)
- HOT TOPIC: FISH FARMS comprising the following 4 letters: Dirty end to clean, green, clever; Clean up your act; Jobs no compensation; Save your surroundings; Port Arthur better choice. (Mercury 14 April 2017)
- Time for a traffic fix (Mercury editorial, 25 February 2017)
- Rapid growth not sustainable (Mercury 22 February 2017)
- No vision for growth (Mercury 6 Feb 2017)
- Planning concerns (Mercury 13 Jan 2017)
- Destructive plans (Mercury 14 Dec 2016)
- Planning to lose (Mercury 10 Dec 2016)
- Population bomb (Mercury 2 Dec 2016)
- Lacking vision (Mercury 2 Dec 2016)
- What we want (Mercury 2 Dec 2016)
- Make planning decision properly public (Mercury 23 Nov 2016)
- Planning fears (Mercury 23 Nov 2016)
- Coastal great wall (Mercury 21 Nov 2016)
- Hobart, follow the lead of Paris (Mercury, 18 Nov 2016)
- Plans for the future (Mercury, 18 Nov 2016)
- Scale of South Hobart project all wrong (Mercury 18 Nov 2016)
- Heritage at risk (Mercury 17 Nov 2016)
- Wrong way on salmon and planning (Mercury, 15 Nov 2016)
- Sacrificing the public (Mercury, 12 Nov 2016)
- Big Tassie doubts (Mercury, 12 Nov 2016)
- Too big (Mercury, 12 Nov 2016)
- Ignore the public at your peril Minister (Mercury, 10 Nov 2016)
- Keep our uniqueness (Mercury, 3 Nov 2016)
- Once more into the breach (Mercury, 2 Nov 2016)
- Stay different (Mercury, 2 Nov 2016)
- Planning problems (Mercury, 13 October 2016)
- Repent at leisure (Mercury 5 October 2016)
- Planning horrors (Mercury, 26 August 2016)
- Draft Statewide planning scheme fails (Mercury, 21 June 2016)
Media releases
TasPIN - 19 April 2016
Planning law changes will change Tassie forever Planning laws are being significantly changed this year. The new Tasmanian Planning Scheme (TPS) is out now on the Tas Planning Commission website and up for public comment till 18th May. Many people are feeling left behind by what will be galloping change in our communities. Once this new TPS is implemented there will be no going back.
All of this has happened with virtually no real public conversation about how we want Tassie to look in the future; how we can best manage the old, plan for the new with the state’s natural and built environment whilst also attracting tourists and new residents. Well said Richard Goodram! In Mercury letters, 12 April, Mr Goodram quotes visitor feedback, writing that people come here for the “clean, green, small, in an attractive architectural setting” which is increasingly attractive in our fast paced world of twenty-first century.
Do people around Tassie know the following?
- In the General Residential zone (a very large part of suburban Hobart and other Tasmanian cities), dwellings and units up to twice the height and density of surrounding buildings will be classified as “no permit required”. These buildings will be able to be built without any notice to neighbours or opportunity to comment on how it will affect the character of their area.” The new planning provisions allow much smaller block sizes, increased height and densities, more concrete, more units and minimal garden space. Little regard is given to quality of life. Do not despair though, unit dwellers will be allowed 3 hours of sunlight in the middle of winter in their living space, if they are lucky!
- Councillors who are elected to look after their ratepayers and their local area now appear to be largely sidelined by this process and risk losing their ability to stand up for what their community values.
- Even these changes aren’t enough for some. There is also a concerted move by the development lobby to undermine the established legal processes by which the rest of us have to abide, at the same time overriding the community’s right to voice an opinion (see Jessica Howard’s Mercury article p2 Sat 2nd April titled “Planning power push”)
- There has been no open public discussion to allow people to actually see what our cities, suburbs, environmental areas might look like (a small ad in the Mercury advertising a 429 page document of highly technical planning provisions plus an almost equally lengthy 245 page document of explanatory notes hardly qualifies).
In European cities, people successfully go about their activities within historic spaces, respecting the heritage character and applying a cautious approach – changing as much as necessary, but as little as possible (Burra Charter 2013, cl 3.1). Hobart and indeed all of Tasmania needs a planning system that respects what is wonderful about our island state.
The new planning laws will change this state forever. The government is promoting the new system as “fairer, simpler, faster and cheaper”. A system that makes it faster and cheaper to degrade what makes Tassie unique, what brings visitors to this island, and what residents love is certainly not fairer! Please check out the Tasmanian Planning Commission website and the new state planning provisions (SPPs). Let’s tell the government over the next 4 weeks that to serve current and future Tasmanians we need a planning system that is not only fairer and simpler, but “better”.